Orthopedics Research - Chronic Injuries, Muscoskeletal Disorders, Surgery, Reconstruction

Orthopedics Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Orthopedics, including details on chronic injuries, muscoskeletal disorders, surgery, reconstruction.


Orthopedics Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Orthopedics

Books on Orthopedics

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



A quantitative composite scoring tool for orthopaedic residency screening and selection.

Turner NS, Shaughnessy WJ, Berg EJ, Larson DR, Hanssen AD

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

The ability to accurately screen and select orthopaedic resident applicants with eventual successful outcomes has been historically difficult. Many preresidency selection variables are subjective in nature and a more standardized objective scoring method seems desirable. A quantitative composite scoring tool (QCST) to be used in a standardized manner to help predict orthopaedic residency performance from application materials was developed. In 64 orthopaedic residents, four predictors (United States Medical Licensing Examination [USMLE] Part I scores, Alpha Omega Alpha status, junior year clinical clerkship honors grades, and the QCST score) were analyzed with respect to four residency outcomes assessments. The outcomes included three standardized assessments, the orthopaedic in-training examination scores (OITE), the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) written and oral examinations, and an internal outcomes assessment, attainment of satisfactory chief resident associate (CRA) status. Collectively, the QCST score had the strongest association as a predictor for all three standardized outcomes assessments (p < 0.001). Honors grades during junior years clinical clerkships was most strongly associated with satisfactory CRA status (p < 0.001). A composite scoring tool that is an effective predictor of orthopaedic resident outcomes can be developed. Additional work is still required to refine this scoring tool for orthopaedic residency screening and selection.

Published 4 August 2006 in Clin Orthop Relat Res, 449: 50-5.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Orthopedics Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Orthopedics Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (June)
  Issue 2 (July)
  Issue 3 (August)
  Issue 4 (September)
  Issue 5 (October)
  Issue 6 (November)
  Issue 7 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)



Orthopedics Books

Orthopaedic Clinical Examination: An Evidence Based Approach for Physical Therapists (Netter Clinical Science)

Orthopaedic Clinical Examination: An Evidence Based Approach for Physical Therapists (Netter Clinical Science)